The Women’s Rights Protocol arguably demonstrated the maturity of the African women’s movement, showing the power of collective agenda setting and follow through in a systematic and coherent way, says Pamela Mhlanga.

As the second anniversary of the coming into force of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (the Women’s Rights Protocol) dawns, we need to pause and reflect. The adoption and subsequent coming into force of the Women’s Rights Protocol was a turning point in the struggle for the rights of women on the continent. Women’s rights discourse and practice was deepened and expanded, and the Women’s Rights Protocol has proved to be a source of inspiration for keeping the momentum to achieve women of Africa’s full equality. The reflection, during this second anniversary, should thus focus on what we know, what we have learnt, and what we are carrying forward to strengthen ourselves as a women’s movement, as well as the content and practice of women’s rights, thereby solidify the gains we have made and decisively tackling the gaps remaining.

The Women’s Rights Protocol arguably demonstrated the maturity of the African women’s movement, showing the power of collective agenda setting and follow through in a systematic and coherent way. It also signaled that the experiences, voices and engagement of women of Africa with human rights matter, and these nuances wee captured in the form of the Protocol. Significantly, it marked the further institutionalization and affirmation of the rights of women on the continent; there is now a ‘homegrown’ source of women’s rights to which we can refer, underpinned by universal human rights standards.

What we know, however, is that women ‘do not eat paper’, and we face the perennial issue of promise vs delivery, and, by extension, ‘paper rights’ vs substantive rights. What we also know is that African governments ratify international human rights instruments all the time, and, dare it be said, often with impunity, as a number of them dance the ratification dance at international level, yet show little sign of domesticating or implementing their commitments. A case in point is that all 14 Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries have ratified CEWDAW, and only 3 countries have domesticated it, due in part to unique constitutional provisions providing for self-execution of ratified international obligations. Another case in point, is numerous reports replete with empirical evidence of little progress in enlarging women of Africa’s entitlements to fully engage with rights, thus denial of rights is still rampant, from violations of bodily integrity, sexuality, and socio economic rights, to outright discrimination often entrenched in national legal frameworks; the long reach of patriarchy and sexism, and increasingly backlash and rise of fundamentalisms, continue to coalesce and pose a fundamental challenge to the positive steps thus far taken to claim our rights.

This contradictory picture of progress and regression begs the question, if substantive delivery on women’s rights remains such a challenge, how are we to reframe the struggle to claim our rights, and how do we continue to creatively use the Women’s Rights Protocol as a point of reference? Certainly for the women’s movement, the struggle for rights must not only remain deeply political, but also located and articulated within broader struggles for advancing participatory democracy, people centred development and good governance. It must go further and be framed as nothing short of an agenda for transformation; radicalising the empowerment project in a way that fundamentally shifts gendered stratifications in structures, processes, cultures and political ethos in new ways.

This agenda for transformation implies a reconceptualisation of indicators of success in achieving women’s rights as a ‘live’ and dynamic process, defined by what is working or not working for women at any given time, not confined to occasional reports, and defining one or two acts or promises by governments as evidence of ‘political will’. The current poverty eradication and HIV/AIDS response frameworks, for example, are not working for women, otherwise these devastating conditions would not have our faces imprinted on them; why after so many decades do we still talk about the feminisation of poverty?

It is absolutely essential that the ‘footsteps’ of women are traced, and their voices made visible in empowering ways, in order to excavate the authentic voice that will not be erased by sophisticated frameworks for advancing rights that are, at times, so complex many of us hardly recognise ourselves in them; the project, as one activist has pointed out, is as much about going back to basics in terms of raising critical consciousness amongst women about asserting our rights and dignity, as it is about sitting on high tables negotiating complex legal instruments based on our agenda and demands. The establishment of the Solidarity for African Women’s Rights (SOAWR) is a point of departure, as the network is working towards harness this complex political agenda in the context of the Women’s Rights Protocol, in a way that aims to bridge the dichotomy between paper rights and substantive rights.

There is an understanding within the SOAWR network, made up of continental and national based women’s empowerment organizations, that the deployment of the Women’s Rights Protocol requires a deepening and broadening ownership of the content of the Protocol, achieved through mobilising a groundswell of support from all the places where women are, in order to create new opportunities for demanding accountability and delivery. Thus whilst some members are visible in key forums such as the AU and SADC Summits, others are taking the message to places where critical engagement is also essential, such as local communities. There is a recognition also that quiet diplomacy in pushing for change may be useful up to a point, so some members are working on public interest litigation cases, and using issue based advocacy such as gender based violence, to place the Women’s Rights Protocol on as many agendas as possible.

SOAWR members recognise the value of broadening the power base in order to ensure strategic influence at all levels, thus they have sought to engage both state and non state actors. In the years beyond this second anniversary of the coming into force of the Women’s Rights Protocol, there are various points of influence that will be necessary to continue to engage, not just by SOAWR but other initiatives, if the continent is to move from 22 ratifications to 53, and there is a fast and effective transition from ratification to domestication and implementation. These would include, amongst others, structured linkages with coalitions working towards an effective African Court on Human and People’s Rights, as well as groups addressing critical issues of people centred empowerment; closer ties with all Regional Economic Communities, supporting the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Women in Africa, a more pivotal role at every point of gender mainstreaming processes in institutions, structures and processes that matter to us, including stronger ties with the AU Gender Directorate and the African Centre for Gender and Social Development in the ECA, amongst others. Equally important should be the refusal to continue to engage in spaces that no longer serve us, but deepening our own internal engagement on lessons we have learnt and how we can leverage this learning to be more effective as a women’s movement, including ensuring mutually supporting each other’s efforts. The struggle continues.

* Pamela Mhlanga is Head of Programme, Women in Development Southern Africa Awareness (WIDSAA) Programme, at the Southern African Research and Documentation Centre (SARDC)

* Please send comments to or comment online at www.pambazuka.org