African Painters - (http://africanpainters.blogspot.com/2006/06/suzanne-ouedraogo-from-burki...) comments on the work of Burkina Faso artist, Suzanne Ouedraogo who uses her art as a way of protesting against the practice of female circumcision. Her paintings present are a courageous, powerful picture of this horrendous violation of the female body. He accompanies the paintings with a poem on female circumcision by Nigerian poet, Chinwe Azubuike.

Egyptian Chronicles - Egyptian Chronicles (http://egyptianchronicles.blogspot.com/2006/07/bravo-aisha-first-egyptia...) writes in praise of Egypt’s Minister of Labour and Employment, Aisha Abd El-Hady, a woman she had formerly thought of as a hypocrite. So why the change in attitude towards the Minister?

“Abd El-Hady presented her resignation from her position as a minister for Labour and Employment in the ministry to the Prime Minister Ahmed Nazif as she can't work anymore in this Cabinet who doesn't care for the 5 million workers who are going to lose their jobs because of the privatisation policy . The man who is responsible in privatisation in Egypt now is Minister Mahmoud Mohi El-Din, minister of investment , he is working on selling 365 public companies to the private sector. Already Abd El-Hady accused Mohi El-Din to ignore President Mubarak 's orders in protecting the workers rights”.

Abd El-Hady is an interesting woman. She only completed her education up to primary school level yet was able to hold her ground amongst the higher educated members of the Cabinet. She worked her way up starting as a factory worker which was one of the reasons why many Egyptian workers were disappointed with her previous lack of interest in their plight.

The Moor Next Door - Moor Next Door (http://wahdah.blogspot.com/2006/07/spirits-of-63.html) returns to the Algerian revolution that took place between 1955-1962 and celebrates the country’’s independence on the 5th July 1962.

“The Algerian Revolution was a revolt against exclusion, under-representation, racialism, displacement, colonialism, ignorance and all the other pretty words that come with battles in the name of rights. Algerians today, hold all of these notions close to their hearts, no matter what their political persuasion may be. The Revolution was a diverse one, claimed by former "assimilationists" fed up with the inability of the colonial system to extend the rights of man to Algerian Muslims, pan-Arab nationalists, socialists, Marxists, communists, Islamists wishing to reinstate the Islamic political order in a Muslim land, Amazigh Berberists wishing to bring equality and prestige to their people, the everyday men and women of Algerian wishing to finally know what equality and opportunity felt like, and many other interest groups.”

He writes that although the Algerian revolution could be described as a “Jihad” it was not one of those Jihad’s or “mass murder, rape, pillage, and bigotry that have ravaged the world in recent years.” It is a revolution based on patriotism and nationalism driven by an intense desire for independence and freedom.

Sotho - Sotho (http://sotho.blogsome.com/2006/07/01/francais-et-immigres/) writes a piece on the racist language used by the media when speaking about French immigrants and Black French people. He uses the commentary on the world cup to explain his point.

“Paper and television personalities are regularly accused of saying things like, “the Frenchman came from behind to win the race,” but “the Guadeloupean fell behind and never posed a threat to his opponents.” And they’d be talking about the same person, albeit at different times. It is surely subconscious but nevertheless shows deep-rooted ill-feeling toward the concept of fraternité.”

He goes on to give a number of examples of specific comments made about the Tunisians, Ghanaians and the French team which has mostly Black players.

French right wing National Front leader Jean-Marie Le Pen also made a comment about the number of Black players in the French team to which one player responded. We are French. We won the World Cup and the European Cup and we did it for France so what is the point of your comment.

afrika-aphukira - Afrika-aphukira (http://mlauzi.blogspot.com/2006/07/african-football-global-inequality-an...) also comments on the World Cup and the African media’s response to why no African teams progressed beyond the early stages of the tournament. He believes the analysis used reflect the usual two themes reflected in Africa’s media: self-blame and awe of Europe.

“Virtually no analysis I have so far looked at mentions broader issues of global, historical and political injustice and inequality, in how world cup berths are allotted in the different FIFA confederations. In fact, a Rwandan columnist repeats a common refrain about how Africans always blame colonialism for their ills, when no such thing has even been mentioned in any of the analyses and comments, whose uniting feature has been blaming African teams for lacking self-confidence and resources. Such is the strength of the reluctance to examine African problems in their broader context that blaming colonialism is considered not only taboo, it is brought up even when nobody mentions it.”

He believes there is a need to look at the way the World Cup is organised particularly the allocating of slots and the fact that all World Cups with the exception of Japan and Korea in 2002 have been played either in Europe or South America. For example

"The continent of Europe has 51 national football associations, and has 14 (15 in 2002) world cup finals slots. Africa, which has 52 member associations, has only 5 slots, an improvement from 1978 when Africa was accorded only one slot. "

And so it continues. However I believe one of the main issues for African teams in the World Cup is that many of Africa’s best play for European teams having gained citizenship of various countries. In addition the financial resources and therefore the training facilities are totally inadequate. In the case of the African Nations Cup many of the Africans playing in Europe did not even want to leave their league teams to come and play for their countries. Could one imagine a European or South American player acting in this way? I doubt it.

Building the Nation - Building the Nation (http://2bnileavenue.blogspot.com/2006/07/comment-4-dennis-thoughts-on-ga... ) responds to a post on Ugandan blog, Country Boyi in which he writes a vitriolic piece on homosexuality in Uganda with the usual comments on it being “un African” and “gay people are headed for hell”. Building the Nation writes

“Firstly, because Dr. Sylvia Tamale advocates for the rights of people who are gay does not make her gay, period. It does not mean she wants to fuck another woman, to borrow a phrase from you. It just means she’s standing up for what she believes to be a marginalised section of society. Something we all should do for people we personally believe to be marginalised. For example, I am a proponent of the – now stillborn - Domestic Relations Bill (DRB). Does that make me a woman?”

It is excellent that this debate on homosexuality is taking place in the African blogosphere. Previously there have been discussions in the Kenyan and Nigerian blogospheres and now in Uganda. Let us hope the discussions continue as it is only through debate on the issues that transformation will take place eventually.

Harowo.com - Harowo.com (http://harowo.com/2006/07/03/somalia-washingtons-warlords-lose-out) comments on the role of the USA in supporting the coalition of warlords under the name of “Alliance for the Restoration of Peace and Counterterrorism (ARPCT).

According to the writer, the CIA have been paying the Alliance between $100,000 and $150,000 a month via their Nairobi office. He explains the response by the people of Somalia to the victory of the Islamic Courts Union (ICU)

“Somali reactions to the ICU's victory have been mixed. On one hand there is relief at the prospect of a respite from constant battles in the capital, but for some this is tempered by fears of the imposition of draconian interpretations of sharia (Islamic) law. .....
Among many though there is hope that the ICU will at least provide a degree of stability in a country that has been gripped by violent conflict between rival warlords since the 1991 ouster of military dictator Mohammed Siad Barre. He took power in 1969 and had originally aligned Somalia with the Soviet Union, but the alliance was broken when Barre came into conflict with Ethiopia in 1977.
Washington stepped in to fill the gap and supported Barre until he was toppled in 1991 by rebel forces led by General Mohammed Farah Aidid, Barre's former intelligence chief. In the wake of Barre's overthrow, the country was carved up by rival warlords. Under the guise of a UN-backed "humanitarian mission", Washington dispatched 20,000 US troops to Somalia in 1992.”

The fact that the CIA website lists Somalia’s resources as uranium plus other natural minerals does of course question the motives behind the involvement of the USA in Somalia both now and in the past.

Black Looks - Black Looks (http://www.blacklooks.org/2006/07/1906-2006_-_history_still_repeats_itse... ) builds on last weeks interview withGeorges Nzongola-Ntalaja in Pambazuka News in which he spoke on the “strategic importance of the DRC” and on the probable outcome of the elections at the end on this month. Black Looks takes an historical route based on the political biography of Patrice Lumumba and returns to 18 and the beginnings of Leopold of Belgium’s rule in the Congo around 1906 when he first invited and international monopoly capital to the country and sold off mineral mining and agricultural rights.

“Firstly land was given to the mining companies; secondly land was used for the creation of a system of national parks; thirdly huge tracks of farmland were given to white settlers. But ultimately it was the mining sector that took control of the country and remains in control today. Two regions, the Katanga and Kivu provinces most affected by the above distribution of land have also been the most affected by war and conflict throughout the history of Congo.”

She concludes that Nzongola-Ntalaja’s prediction that nothing will change is a correct assessment of the post election period. The multinationals will continue to exploit the country, the corrupt leaders to exploit the people and the people to remain in poverty and victims of the various marauding militias wondering the countryside.