In his new book Ending Aid Dependence, Yash Tandon reviews the possibilities for change in the architecture of aid. The author explores the extent to which many developing countries reliant on aid wish to escape dependence, and yet are constrained from doing so. Proposing that moving away from dependence should be at the top of the political agenda of all developing countries, this timely book cautions countries of the global South from falling into the aid trap and endorsing the collective colonialism of the OECD.
Dorothy-Grace Guerrero and Firoze Manji (ed) (2008) China’s New Role in Africa and the South: A search for a new perspective. 
Announcements
Policy Brief on Agrofuels and the 2007 US Energy Bill
Food First (2008-03-26)
http://pambazuka.org/en/category/Announce/46948
Printer friendly version
Report highlights growing hunger, energy dependency on Global South, corporate control
Food First/The Institute for Food & Development Policy, based in Oakland, Calif., has released a policy brief titled, “When Renewable isn’t Sustainable: Agrofuels’ and the Inconvenient Truths behind the 2007 U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act.” The report, co-authored by Food First Executive Director Eric Holt-Giménez and program consultant Isabella Kenfield, discusses the implications of the Renewable Fuels Standards (RFS) targets for agrofuels in the 2007 U.S. Energy Bill.
The first inconvenient truth of the RFS mandate is the effect it is already having on food prices and supplies around the world. It is estimated that half of the U.S. corn harvest will be diverted to ethanol production by the end of 2008. Because U.S. corn accounts for some 40% of global production, increased demand for U.S. corn as feedstock for fuel impacts global markets for corn as food. As acreage planted to corn increases from rising demand, acreage for other food grains such as wheat and soybeans is reduced, raising the prices for these crops as well. People around the world are already experiencing the food price and supply shocks that the spike in U.S. ethanol demand and consumption is causing.
A second inconvenient truth about the RFS mandate is that instead of offering energy independence and security, the 2007 Energy Bill actually reflects a bi-partisan, unspoken agreement to rely on imported agrofuels from the Global South. This is already leading to massive environmental destruction, loss of livelihoods and human rights abuses in agrofuels-producing regions of the South, and threatens to further economic and political instability in these regions.
To better understand the agrofuels boom, the authors analyze how the industry is aiding market expansion and consolidation by the giant grain, biotech and oil companies. Contrary to being “clean” and “green,” agrofuels exacerbate all of the problems currently caused by industrial agriculture—including global warming.
Holt-Giménez concludes that “In order to think about alternatives to agrofuels—local biofuels, conservation, wind, or solar—and in order to advance truly sustainable agricultural development at home and abroad, we need to construct an alternative food and energy context. We must challenge the political-economic context as well as the technologies, debunk the assumptions as well as the claims, and propose new relationships between producers and consumers in our food and fuel systems.”
To remove the artificial market incentive that created the industry—the RFS targets—Food First, with a coalition of progressive U.S. organizations, proposes a Moratorium on U.S. agrofuels. The call for a Moratorium can be found and signed here: http://ga3.org/campaign/agrofuelsmoratorium
To obtain a copy of the report, log on to www.foodfirst.org
Readers' Comments
Let your voice be heard. Comment on this article.